In DeShaney v. Winnebago County Social Services, when do police have a duty to guarantee safety?

Study for the Florida EOT Training Test with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Hints and explanations are provided for each question. Get ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

In DeShaney v. Winnebago County Social Services, when do police have a duty to guarantee safety?

Explanation:
The idea being tested is that police do not have a blanket duty to guarantee everyone’s safety. In DeShaney v. Winnebago County Social Services, the Supreme Court held that the state isn’t constitutionally required to shield individuals from private harm unless there’s a special relationship that creates a duty to protect. The clearest example is custodial situations—when the state has taken on responsibility for someone’s safety, such as a child in state custody. Without that relationship (or without the state creating or worsening the danger), there’s no due process-based obligation to protect. So the best answer is that police have no duty to guarantee safety unless there is a special relationship such as custody.

The idea being tested is that police do not have a blanket duty to guarantee everyone’s safety. In DeShaney v. Winnebago County Social Services, the Supreme Court held that the state isn’t constitutionally required to shield individuals from private harm unless there’s a special relationship that creates a duty to protect. The clearest example is custodial situations—when the state has taken on responsibility for someone’s safety, such as a child in state custody. Without that relationship (or without the state creating or worsening the danger), there’s no due process-based obligation to protect. So the best answer is that police have no duty to guarantee safety unless there is a special relationship such as custody.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy